Photo 10 shows a typical display of architecture of
fear in Woodford Square, Port of Spain.
|
The photo above shows the
barricade of a small garden in Woodford Square, Port of Spain that is enchained
by spike chains. It could be suggested that this was purposely done to prevent
socially displaced persons from siting or even reclining at the garden’s
barricade. The scenery could be simply classed as a fortress landscape since
the spike chains are there for the purpose of security, protection and
exclusion. Fortress landscapes are becoming more common in the Capital of
Trinidad and Tobago as a response to the increasing deviant behaviours in the
urban area. It is said that architecture, planning and urban design have a
tradition of designing urban landscapes for the purpose of controlling bodies
of people and fostering particular modes of behaviour and urban living, either
explicitly in the form of orders and instructions inserted into the urban
landscape or more subtly through the design of elements of it (Hall and Barrett
2012, 209). Although these types of architectural designs are useful for
protection they could also facilitate inequality through exclusion. Many people
may view such landscapes as being exclusive and locals could retaliate by
protesting or even being rebellious through vandalism.
Methods of demonstrating
exclusion in cities can be detrimental to urban social life. For instance, unity
is likely to be hampered within such context and discrimination becomes predominant
which may possibly affect the social development of the lower classes. According
to Hall and Barrett (2012), the implications of such actions are potentially
dangerous for equality and conviviality of urban life.
Exclusiveness caused by
fortress landscapes in Port of Spain may be a difficult issue to digest for many
people, particularly the poor, homeless, and others. However, it should be
noted that such landscapes can serve a very important purpose in terms of
protection and maintenance of property. Therefore, it should be ensured that
people are being excluded from certain areas only for the basis of protection
and maintenance of property and not because of one’s ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, financial status and other personal socioeconomic reasons.
References
Hall, Tim, and Heather Barrett. 2012. Urban Geography 4th edition.
London and New York: Routledge.
Exclusiveness I like that part, you could have included gated communities. But great post looking forward to reading the other blogs.
ReplyDeleteLike Ryan, I also enjoyed this post. Provocative.
ReplyDelete